The Trump administration may not enforce new policies that make it more difficult for immigrants to obtain asylum due to gender or gang violence, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., said Wednesday.
In a rare move, the judge then ordered the government to bring several of the migrant-plaintiffs back to the United States for new asylum hearings.
“This ruling is a defeat for the Trump administration’s all-out assault on the rights of asylum seekers,” said Jennifer Chang Newell, managing attorney of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project. “The government’s attempt to obliterate asylum protections is unlawful and inconsistent with our country’s longstanding commitment to provide protection to immigrants fleeing for their lives.”
Migrants who enter the country illegally are subject to a proceeding called expedited removal. However, those aliens can qualify for asylum if they show a credible fear of persecution in their home country because of their race, religion, nationality, social group, or political opinion. This is called a “credible fear determination.”
Former Attorney General Jeff Sessions issued new guidance stating that vulnerability to gangs or domestic violence would generally not be a sufficient basis to show credible fear during an expedited removal proceeding. The Department of Justice administers immigration courts, thus placing them under the AG’s direction.
The plaintiffs in Wednesday’s case are 12 adults and children from Central America who sought asylum in the U.S. for fear of persecution by gangs or abusive partners. Though immigration officers found their accounts believable, under Sessions’ revised rules they failed a credible fear determination and were slated for deportation.
The migrants challenged the new policies in court, represented by the ACLU and UC Hastings Center for Gender and Refugee Studies. The plaintiffs asserted the Justice Department’s revisions violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Attorney General Jeff Sessions addresses a news conference to announce a criminal law enforcement action involving China and a new Department of Justice initiative focusing on China’s economic activity, at the Justice Department in Washington. November 1, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan issued a sweeping decision agreeing with the migrants on both points. (RELATED: Establishment Republicans Tell Supreme Court Trump’s Asylum Ban Is Unlawful)
“The court holds that it has jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs’ challenges to the credible fear policies, that it has the authority to order the injunctive relief, and that, with the exception of two policies, the new credible fear policies are arbitrary, capricious, and in violation of the immigration laws,” Sullivan’s decision reads.
The judge then said that six of the plaintiffs who have already left the United States should return to have their claims reassessed.
Sullivan is currently presiding over Michael Flynn’s criminal case.
The Justice Department will consider an appeal.
“Under the laws passed by Congress, asylum is only for those who have a legitimate fear of persecution on the basis of their race, nationality, religion, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group,” Justice Department spokesman Steven Stafford said. “We are reviewing our options with regard to this ruling, and we will continue to restore the rule of law in our immigration system.”
Send tips to kevin@
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.